Topic: CWF members survey (Read 72359 times)

Pikari · « **Reply #160 on:** July 24 2006, 07:08 am »

Quote from: Robin Sena on July 23 2006, 08:07 pm

As with Heero said, rules 1 and 2 are conflicting and only one will be implemented. No decisions yet on which will be used though so I wait.

Okay. I just found it weird that those were put in what looked like a 'final rule list' and nobody was discussing it. ^^;

Kina, The Dark Keyblade Master · « **Reply #161 on:** July 24 2006, 02:56 pm »

Quote from: Heero on July 24 2006, 02:54 pm

The question is....who is willing to receive those messages.....

either a mod or somebody who doesn't get PMs much...

Hack · « **Reply #162 on:** July 24 2006, 03:11 pm »

that would be me, no one really PMs me unless i requested something >>

~Emethyst~ · « **Reply #163 on:** July 24 2006, 03:56 pm »

@.hack & Heero : How frequent do you visit CWF? Maybe you two can receive the PMs.... Just a suggestion. If not... then, we'll be needing some volunteers or rather the consent of a mod...

Møon Li · « **Reply #164 on:** July 24 2006, 04:02 pm »

I think is better to let that to a mod...

Robin Sena · « **Reply #165 on:** July 24 2006, 05:49 pm »

Okay, time to decide.

PM Type or Board Topic type for Nominations?

~Emethyst~ · « **Reply #166 on:** July 24 2006, 06:00 pm »

I think I'd go with PM-ing mainly because the candidates wouldn't be aware that they were nominated and causes more excitement than seeing the candidates on board

Arcademan · « **Reply #167 on:** July 24 2006, 09:52 pm »

Quote from: Heero on July 24 2006, 04:45 pm

A moderator....why not an administrator.......

Truthfully......the board thing sounds better to me........

The administrators have other things to worry about than getting involved in this.

If the PM system is going to be done, I guess I can do it. All I need to do is find a way to squeeze another hour or two in a 24 hour day

Robin Sena · « **Reply #168 on:** July 24 2006, 10:17 pm »

Arcademan - Well it does need someone who can stick around for at least 12 hours.

If the PM system stays, how about multiple users sharing the workload?

I kinda like the annonymity it brings.

Arcademan · « **Reply #169 on:** July 25 2006, 10:12 am »

Quote from: Robin Sena on July 24 2006, 10:17 pm

Arcademan - Well it does need someone who can stick around for at least 12 hours.

If the PM system stays, how about multiple users sharing the workload?

I kinda like the annonymity it brings.

I check in here every morning, when I get home from work and before I head to bed.

Fai · « **Reply #170 on:** July 26 2006, 07:17 am »

-Peeks in-

I vote for going with the PM type because then when the candidates are reveled, the surprise is even greater ^_^

Hack · « **Reply #171 on:** July 26 2006, 11:49 am »

i guess i'll go with everyone else
PM system...it will be more surprising if the candidates didn't know

~Bloody_Rose~ · « **Reply #172 on:** July 26 2006, 01:34 pm »

by PM! so it will be a surprise! and only the user who receives the PMs is the only one who knows who are the nominees

Hack · « **Reply #173 on:** July 26 2006, 02:24 pm »

true true^ maybe a category per receiver

Fai · « **Reply #174 on:** July 26 2006, 02:36 pm »

I think that's a good idea...It would be less of a hassle to sort wouldn't it?

Hack · « **Reply #175 on:** July 26 2006, 02:38 pm »

yeah, and it would be less complicated for the receiver to count too

Robin Sena · « **Reply #176 on:** July 26 2006, 05:37 pm »

It works that way. One user to receive PM's for one award.

Though it takes quite a lot of users.

~Emethyst~ · « **Reply #177 on:** July 26 2006, 05:40 pm »

Quote from: Robin Sena on July 26 2006, 05:37 pm

It works that way. One user to receive PM's for one award.

Though it takes quite a lot of users.

Looks fine to me

Presenters and other volunteers can do that

~Emethyst~ · « **Reply #178 on:** July 26 2006, 07:28 pm »

^ Voting for that one. Oherwise, the leakage of information will disrupt the flow of vote charting and counting, messing up the whole activity as well.

Robin Sena · « **Reply #179 on:** July 26 2006, 07:42 pm »

Hehehe... talk about the sense of "who will it be?".

So yeah, I'm for no infomation sharing.

News:

AuthorTopic: CWF members survey (Read 72359 times)