Misc > General Media

Harry Potter (Beware of Spoilers!)

<< < (2/115) > >>

D.J.P:
Out here in Aus:

Movie 1 was rating the worst (due to its introductry style)
Movie 2: was ok
Movie 3: really hit it off

Honestly I like Movie 3 the best so-far :D

and about the books/movie, they are true different mediums, the director of movie 3 said in order to remain true the movies would
have to be 16 hours long (imagine that - I can barely stand a 2 and a half hour movie)

ani:
i like the books better than the movies.. :P HP and PoA [prisoner of azkaban] was really disappointing.. :(
i am however waiting and hoping that the GoF movie is better and that Jo doesn't kill my favorites in the 6th book..  The books are sooo much more better than the movies.. :P more details! like Peeves.. I wanted peeves in the movies.. *sniffles*

i'm like a mixed shipper fan but i like Draco / Hermione best.. :P I like.. Hemrione/Ron, Hermione/Harry, Ron/Luna,  Ginny/Harry and Hermione/Draco.. tehehe.. :P

Tune:
maybe i compared movie 3 to the book too much~ :P thats y it didnt seemed satisfactory to me...though any1 has any ideas bout the 6th book: the half-blood prince? the title seems to be a change in style~ :P

D.J.P:

--- Quote ---i like the books better than the movies.. :P HP and PoA [prisoner of azkaban] was really disappointing
--- End quote ---

and about the books/movie, they are two completly different mediums, the director of movie 3 said in order to remain true the movies would
have to be 16 hours long.

Honestly, most people just don't get that, when making judgements about movies *based* (remember the movies are based) on books.

ani:
the 3rd movie didn't mention much about james and the maurader's names or such.. if i didn't read the book after the thrid movie i wouldn't have understood it much..

also .. it was a comletely different setting to the other two.. i think that's why i didn't like it most.. the previous settings were familiar to me already.. :P

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page